Attention!! As of December 12, 2014, an art exhibit will be held in the cafeteria in the M building. I chose that specific place because since a lot of students and staff go there to eat or pass by quick for something, it is a perfect location to place the paintings. As they are eating they end up wandering around and eventually will place their eyes on paintings. The audience here is everyone at La Guardia.
My theme is New York as art. We
live in one of the most famous artistic city of the country. New York consists
of various elements that makes it a unique work of art. I came up with this
idea because New York a lot of different architecture and a lot of different
skyscrapers in different shape and sizes. New York has a lot of different
locations to visit such as museums, galleries, the Empire State Building and
Central Park! We might have visited these places before but other from around
the world come to visit these places. This is important because artist paint
these paintings to show how beautiful New York is and its diversity. We are
lucky to be a part of this.
As the curator of this show I
picked these pieces because I wanted to remind us how New York is a beautiful
artistic city. All the pieces connect to each other because they are paintings
of different places of New York. Different artist painted them at a different
time and in a different place and angle. The first painting I chose is by
Leonid Afremov. I picked this painting because it caught my eye as soon as I
came across it. This painting is in Central Park and it’s raining so the artist
uses whitish diagonal to show the raindrops. The people and trees are organic
shapes, and the umbrellas and buildings are geometric shapes. The painting has
primary and secondary colors such as red, yellow and orange, they stand out the
most. Overall the painting has warm colors because of the trees, and the reflection
on the floor makes it seem like it was raining and the sun was setting. The
floor also looks like a rainbow. The painting also has the rule of odds since
there is eleven people in the painting. There is approximate symmetrical. To me
the focal point is the couple.
The next painting is by Margo Hiotis, and it is
inside Central Park. The path is a curvy line and the painting consists of
geometric and organic shapes. The yellow pops out thanks to the green since it
is darker. If we were to cut this painting in half it will be asymmetrical. The
trees overlap each other and there is relative size scale. To me there is no
focal point because everything captures my eye. The third painting is by Tina
Cobelle. This painting is of Central Park from a different angel. It is mostly
made it up out of different types of green. It is a great example of realistic
representational style and the trees and buildings overlap each other. The tree
on the left is the foreground and building on the right is the middle ground
and the background is the grey, orange and yellow building because to me they
seem further away. The last three painting were about a part of New York. The
fourth one is a painting of the whole city by Michael Tompsett. The whole is
city drawn out; it shows all the different types of building there is so it
mostly has geometric shapes. There is primary and secondary colors, it’s like a
rainbow. This painting is approximate symmetry and the focal point is the
empire state building since it is the highest building. The colors just capture
your eyes! The last painting is of the city as well but from a different angle.
By M. Blechner. This panting is of the city at night and it is beautiful. It is
mostly made it up with geometric shapes and it has analogous colors (bluish and
purplish). There is implied light on top of the buildings because they are
suppose to have their lights on since it’s dark. The water reflects all the
colors and it looks so nice. This painting is abstract but doesn’t loose its
sense of realism. It is amazing how New York City is used as a mode. New York
is amazingly beautiful and thanks to nature it helps it look more artistic.
very nice idea Brenda- and you did great using the course vocabulary to describe these works!
ReplyDelete